 | | 
06-25-2008, 08:52 AM
| | Administrator | | Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 125
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by RobAGD  Well as an example the one at McNews is known for being a bit stingie on numbers and the one that was at ProMotionTuning was know for being giving.
I can take the files from eigher and run them in the WinWep software and its not the basic settings. I think it maybe how the thing is configured to be honest but that is a major reason when people way I made 430 to the wheels, the question I would ask is Ok what did you run at the track ? 
The 1/4 mile is the destroyer of dyno babies 
-R | I totally agree with - e.t. and mph do not lie. But I don't think there is much to manipulate with the dynojet. It's a pretty simple device from a technology standpoint. I am going to ask the guys at Dynojet. How much have you seen it vary? Are you sure this couldn't be related to weather conditions or maybe air flow through the shop, etc.? |
06-25-2008, 09:23 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 9
| | | well if you look at the corrected vs non corrected numbers you see the changes.
I alway use the SAE numbers, and Ill be going to the PMT dyno on dyno day soon, so we will see how that reads now.
But the same car that dynoed 405 at PMT dynoed in teh mid 380's at mcnews
-R |
06-25-2008, 02:18 PM
|  | Content Moderator | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 292
| | | Welcome aboard Rob.
Yeah, I am curious about the dynojet thing too. You may be on to something about set up. We have a dynojet here, and we are using a couple of the same vehicles as mules to run on the dyno and they don't vary. It's always a good idea to check your dyno regularly to see if there is a change, and when all things are equal, ours has not changed.
I would like to think that we take very good care of our dynojet dyno, and maybe that is another reason that you see a difference at other testing places. |
06-26-2008, 08:47 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Riverside, Calif
Posts: 413
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by RobAGD well if you look at the corrected vs non corrected numbers you see the changes.
I alway use the SAE numbers, and Ill be going to the PMT dyno on dyno day soon, so we will see how that reads now.
But the same car that dynoed 405 at PMT dynoed in teh mid 380's at mcnews
-R | Interesting, so you're saying they are both being read in SAE, or that the different is uncorrected? |
06-26-2008, 07:11 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 9
| | | Those were SAE if I recall, I never use uncorrected, no accounting for the air quality with that.
-R |
07-04-2008, 02:50 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 9
| | 
Same car, same setup both at the end of tuning sessions a few months apart.
1 Dynojet AWD Eddy Current ( PMT )
1 Dynoet RWD Eddy Current ( McNews )
-R |
07-12-2008, 07:57 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 9
| | Humm so much for people wanting to see the 2 differnt dynos for the same car
-R |
07-12-2008, 08:04 PM
| | Administrator | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Riverside, Calif
Posts: 413
| | | Hey Rob really interested, can you e-mail me the .drf files for those runs. I'll PM you my e-mail. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On | | | | | |
